Plywood Shield vs Broadsword, Katana, Axe, Kriegs. & Hammer

A central place to talk about weapons and armour, as it relates to your kit. This is where you show it of or talk about making it. Discussing the relative merits of types of weapons goes in the WMA section.

Moderators: caedmon, Greg

Post Reply
User avatar
Harper
Haeropada
Posts: 793
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2015 7:11 pm

Plywood Shield vs Broadsword, Katana, Axe, Kriegs. & Hammer

Post by Harper »

User avatar
Kortoso
Haeropada
Posts: 822
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2014 9:37 pm
Location: Chiang Mai, Thailand
Contact:

Re: Plywood Shield vs Broadsword, Katana, Axe, Kriegs. & Ham

Post by Kortoso »

Good video!

I think the katana is not cutting so well because the shield is at a slight angle off of 90 degrees; also the curve of the katana increases the angle where it contacts. (Of course, the Japanese didn't encounter shields so maybe that explains the straight vs curved sword question.)

I've done a little bit of Viking-Age reenactment, using just such a shield.
One of the advantages of such a Viking CGR (center-grip round) is that it is very mobile. In contrast to a "target" style shield that is strapped to your forearm, the CGR has a LOT of "give" built into it. Using it, I would deflect and re-direct incoming blows instead of trying to be a wall and "taking it" - even in a shield wall.

It's interesting that actual Viking-Age shields of this sort that are excavated, universally have been found to be very thin, as little as 1/4" thick, and often edged with rawhide. Of course, you're going to be carrying it around a lot, so why make it thicker and heavier than it needs to be?
There are no safe paths in this part of the world. Remember you are over the Edge of the Wild now, and in for all sorts of fun wherever you go.
Post Reply